Programs face mounting pressure to prove value

7 min reading time
Scroll to top

Credentialing programs are entering a new phase. While growth and adoption remain important, organizations are increasingly expected to demonstrate the impact their programs have on learners, employers, and the business. As expectations rise, proving value has become just as important as delivering it.

This shift isn't happening in a vacuum. As Scott Cheney, CEO of Credential Engine, told the House Education & Workforce Committee: "American families, employers, and taxpayers invest over $2.34 trillion annually in education and training programs but still lack reliable information about which programs develop skills that employers actually value and lead to strong employment outcomes."

Credentialing has entered an accountability era

Demonstrating credentialing program value has become a much bigger priority. This year, 44% of organizations identify it as a top priority — twice as many as last year and the largest increase of any priority we measured.

48% of issuers issue both paper/PDF and digital credentials compared to 45% only digital and 7% only paper and/or PDF
Share

At the same time, 55% of issuers report increased pressure to demonstrate outcomes. Together, these findings suggest credentialing programs are increasingly expected not only to issue credentials, but also to show the impact those credentials create.

This pressure is arriving before many issuers have developed the systems that would respond to it. As Bruce Etter, Senior Director of Research and Consulting at UPCEA, puts it: "Accountability expectations move faster than infrastructure."

Donut chart showing 55% in bold purple, indicating that 55% of issuers report increased pressure to demonstrate program outcomes in the past 12–24 months.
Share

Proving value is more complicated than it sounds

The challenge isn't simply proving value — it's proving value to different audiences. Leaders, learners, employers, boards, and funders often care about different outcomes, making it difficult to rely on a single success metric. Instead, organizations increasingly need multiple forms of evidence that demonstrate value from different perspectives.

Bar chart showing percentages of stakeholders to whom credentialing programs demonstrate value: senior leadership or executives 55%, learners or prospective learners 55%, internal stakeholders 47%, employers or hiring partners 35%, government or funding bodies 23%, board members or trustees 22%, accrediting or regulatory organizations 20%, not currently required to demonstrate value 7%, and I don't know 2%.
Share

Credentialing has moved beyond implementation

Organizations describe credentialing as serving a variety of strategic purposes, from enhancing learner experiences to supporting workforce development and business objectives. The diversity of responses reflects the expanding role credentialing plays across organizations and reinforces why demonstrating value looks different from one program to the next.

Bar chart showing the primary role of credentialing in organizations today with 36% choosing learner experience enhancement, 22% compliance or certification requirement, 20% program growth or engagement driver, and 19% strategic business or workforce initiative.
Share

Program maturity has remained relatively stable year over year, with most organizations describing themselves as growing (37%) or established (29%). Rather than being an emerging practice, credentialing is becoming an established organizational capability.

Bar chart showing responses to how organizations describe the maturity of their credentialing program: 10% getting started in early planning, 19% developing with launched processes, 37% growing with expanding adoption and refined workflows, 29% established with smooth running and strong participation, and 5% optimized with strategic, data-driven measurable impact.
Share

More than half of organizations (54%) use a dedicated, purpose-built digital credentialing platform. The rest rely on their Learning Management System (LMS), an in-house build, or another general-purpose tool.

Bar chart showing types of solutions used to create, issue, and manage digital credentials: 54% use third-party digital credential platform, 23% use learning management or experience platform, 15% use in-house solution, 0% use association management software, and 8% use other solutions.
Share

That distinction is worth pausing on: Proving value to the range of stakeholders described above requires tracking, reporting, and credential metadata that general learning tools weren't built to produce. So the opportunity isn't simply adopting new technology across the board. It's making sure the technology in place can actually generate the evidence organizations are increasingly being asked for. For some, that means using a dedicated platform more fully. For others, it may mean recognizing that the tool itself is the constraint.

The challenge isn't launching credentialing programs anymore. It's scaling them and proving they work. That starts with understanding whether credentials are delivering the outcomes stakeholders expect — beginning with the learners who earn them.

Up next

Credentials deliver, but the career payoff still lags

Pressure to demonstrate value is growing. But the good news is that learners already see the value in credentials. The next question is where programs can do even more to turn that value into meaningful outcomes.

Ready to get started?

Schedule a demo and discover how Accredible can help you attract and reward learners, visualize learning journeys, and grow your program.

Book a demo